Owning, renting out and selling持有、出租與出售

An exclusive use holder is in a different position from an owner of a separate car park lot, because the right attaches to the lot. Letting another resident of the scheme use the space is usually unobjectionable and is often expressly contemplated. Letting it to someone with no connection to the building is a different matter: it may breach the by-laws, and it may breach the development approval, which will have been granted on the basis that the parking serves the building.專用使用權人的地位與獨立車位單元業主有所不同，蓋該權利係附加於單元。供計劃內其他住戶使用，通常並無不當，且往往為規約所明文預設。供與該大樓毫無關聯之人使用，則屬另一回事：此可能違反管理規約，亦可能違反開發許可——該許可係以車位供該大樓使用為前提而核發。

Yes. An owner of a separate car park lot may lease it like any other lot, subject to the by-laws and to the planning conditions attaching to the building. An owner whose space is part of their lot is in the same position for the part of the lot that is the space.可以。獨立車位單元的業主得如同其他任何單元一般將其出租，惟仍受管理規約及該大樓開發條件的限制。車位屬其單元一部分的業主，就該部分而言，其地位相同。

If the space is a separate lot, name it in the contract and in the transfer; leaving it out is the single most common conveyancing failure in Queensland car parking. If the space is exclusive use, do not warrant more than the community management statement supports: the right passes automatically, and there is nothing to convey and nothing to promise beyond what Schedule E says. If the space is a licence, disclose that it is a licence and its term, and do not describe it as "the car space" without qualification. If it is none of these, say so, because a seller who describes a space they cannot prove is buying a dispute that outlives the settlement.車位若為獨立單元，須於契約及移轉文件中逐一載明；遺漏此點是昆士蘭車位交易中最常見的過戶疏失。車位若屬專用使用，所為之擔保不得逾越社區管理聲明所支持的範圍：該權利自動移轉，除附表E所載者外，既無可移轉之物，亦無可承諾之事。車位若係基於使用許可，須披露其為使用許可及其期間，且不得毫無保留地將其描述為「該車位」。若上述皆非，則應據實說明，蓋賣方描述其無法證明的車位，即等同於買下一場交割後仍將延續的糾紛。